Smart Brains Engineers & Technologist Pvt Ltd
CEO Name
Mrinal Bhargava
Communication Address
SmartBrains Engineers & Technologist Pct. Ltd.
A-25, Sec 59, Noida-201301
Top Sectors
Not Available..
Business Model
Training Delivery Through
Classroom,E-learning
Type Of Training Center
Fixed Center
Training Model
Train and Deploy
Revenue Source
Training Fee
Trainee Target Segment
Graduates
Key Achievements/Awards
| S. No. |
Category |
Title |
Issuing Authority |
Issuing Date |
Proof |
| Data yet to be provided by the TP |
Fee Based Programs
| Trainings completed till date |
Placement % achieved |
Number of operational centers (Fixed) |
Number of operational centers (Mobile Centers) |
Average Capacity of Fixed Training Center(s) |
Average Capacity of Mobile Training Center(s) |
Number of Trainers (Full Time) |
Number of Trainers (Part Time ) |
| 0 |
NAN% |
4 |
0 |
180 |
0 |
28 |
9 |
| Sectors Covered |
|
Schemes
|
|
| Data yet to be provided by the TP |
Skill Impact
|
Positive impact on society
Individuals invited to the training program increased their self-reported level of expertise. Training also increased participants’ ability to calculate profit and increased the likelihood that a respondent knew how to start a business.
Participating in training had strong positive effects on subjective measures of well-being. Training increased the share of respondents who reported being happy and satisfied with life, and who agreed that life had improved during the last year by 5 and 7 percentage points, respectively (relative to 78 and 61 percent, respectively, in the comparison group). However, there were no statistically significant effects on health behaviors.
Gender Differences: While there were many positive effects of the vocational training program, these results were mainly driven by male participants. Women invitees spent less time in training compared to men and were no more likely to spend additional time on skill development after training compared to non-invitees. They experienced a much larger decline in personal savings, had lower earnings, and were less likely to have started a business in the previous 12 months.
It is likely that women’s responsibilities at home prevented them from taking full advantage of the training. By tracking down program dropouts, researchers were able to evaluate individuals’ reasons for dropping out and the differential effects of the program by gender. Women cited family obligations as a key reason for not participating in the program, and were more likely to mention getting married or transportation problems as reasons for dropping out. In general, female participation appears to have been much more sensitive to external constraints (e.g, illness and getting fired) compared to their male counterparts. These results shed light on the more stringent constraints under which poor girls have to make decisions in developing countries, and how these may lead to a worse training experience.
|
Photos
|
Data yet to be provided by the TP |
|
Industry Partnerships
|
Data yet to be provided by the TP |
Training Completed Vs Placement Achieved
